Live Science on MSN
Scientists claim 'Lucy' may not be our direct ancestor after all, stoking fierce debate
Recent fossil finds could mean that "Lucy" wasn't our direct ancestor, some scientists say. Others strongly disagree.
In paleoanthropology, a rare, nearly-complete skeleton can rewrite entire chapters of the human origin story. The “Little ...
(Reuters) - The incorporation of meat into the diet was a milestone for the human evolutionary lineage, a potential catalyst for advances such as increased brain size. But scientists have struggled to ...
Green Matters on MSN
New fossil study challenges human origins theory—claims Lucy might not be a direct ancestor
Lucy's position in the history of human evolution is currently being challenged. The Lucy fossil species, or Australopithecus afarensis, was long believed to be an ancestor species that humans ...
Australian researchers think the skeleton found in South Africa is not the same species as two found in the same South Africa cave system ...
A foot fossil found in Ethiopia belonged to an ancient human. The finding could knock one of the most famous names in human evolution from her spot on the family tree.
New fossils link a strange 3.4-million-year-old foot to Australopithecus deyiremeda, a species that mixed climbing skills ...
An international study led by researchers from Australia's La Trobe University and the University of Cambridge has challenged ...
Humans are fundamentally technological creatures. We depend on the manufacture and use of tools for our survival to a degree qualitatively greater than any other species. Therefore, an understanding ...
When studying how fossil hominids moved, researchers usually analyze the morphology of bones—which is crucial for ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results